Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
EchoSense Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-03-11 06:50:43
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (72)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- 1 dead, 9 injured after wrong-way vehicle crash on Maryland highway, police say
- Child shoots and kills another child with a rifle moments after they were playing with Nerf guns, Alaska troopers say
- Georgia prosecutors are suing to strike down a new law that hamstrings their authority
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- 'I'm sorry, God! ... Why didn't you stop it?': School shooter breaks down in jail
- Bed Bath & Beyond returns as online only home furnishings brand
- Uber is soaring. Could it become a trillion-dollar stock?
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- USWNT is in trouble at 2023 World Cup if they don't turn things around — and fast
Ranking
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Fitch downgrades US credit rating, citing mounting debt and political divisions
- Man whose body was found in a barrel in Malibu is identified by authorities
- Chicago police search for a 16-year-old boy who vanished from O'Hare International Airport
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- CVS layoffs: Healthcare giant cutting about 5,000 'non-customer facing positions'
- What are the odds of winning Mega Millions? You have a better chance of dying in shark attack
- General Motors starts shipping Chevy Blazer EV, reveals price and range
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
CVS layoffs: Healthcare giant cutting about 5,000 'non-customer facing positions'
Trump indicted by grand jury in special counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 investigation
Michigan Supreme Court suspends judge accused of covering up her son’s abuse of her grandsons
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
Missouri executes man for 2002 abduction, killing of 6-year-old girl lured to abandoned factory
Erin Foster Responds to Pregnancy Speculation
Utah law requiring age verification for porn sites remains in effect after judge tosses lawsuit